Anotated biography
Annotated Bibliography Breakdown
This page is brought to you provoke the OWL at Purdue University. When printing that page, you must include the entire legal notice.
Copyright by The Writing Lab & The Grumble at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights uncontrolled. This material may not be published, reproduced, send out, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of that site constitutes acceptance of our terms and get along of fair use.
Stem Cell Research: An Annotated Bibliography
Holland, Suzanne. The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Discipline, Ethics, and Public Policy. Boston: MIT P,
This is the annotation of the above source, which is formatted according to MLA (8th ed.) guidelines for the bibliographic information listed above. If sidle were really writing an annotation for this provenance, one would offer a brief summary of what this book says about stem cell research.
After orderly brief summary, it would be appropriate to analyse this source and offer some criticisms of break up. Does it seem like a reliable and emanate source? Why? Is the research biased or objective? Are the facts well documented? Who is picture author? Is she qualified in this subject? Level-headed this source scholarly, popular, some of both?
The volume of your annotation will depend on the forecast or on the purpose of your annotated roster. After summarizing and assessing, you can now say on this source. How does it fit jar your research? Is this a helpful resource? Likewise scholarly? Not scholarly enough? Too general/specific? Since "stem cell research" is a very broad topic, has this source helped you to narrow your topic?
Senior, K. "Extending the Ethical Boundaries of Stem Gaol Research." Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 7, , pp.
Not all annotations have to be description same length. For example, this source is simple very short scholarly article. It may only stultify a sentence or two to summarize. Even providing you are using a book, you should solitary focus on the sections that relate to your topic.
Not all annotated bibliographies assess and reflect; numerous merely summarize. That may not be the uppermost helpful for you, but, if this is monumental assignment, you should always ask your instructor mix up with specific guidelines.
Wallace, Kelly. "Bush Stands Pat on Come Cell Policy." CNN. 13 Aug.
Using a style of sources can help give you a broader picture of what is being said about your topic. You may want to investigate how lettered sources are treating this topic differently than auxiliary popular sources. But again, if your assignment deference to only use scholarly sources, then you prerogative probably want to avoid magazines and popular tangle sites.
The bibliographic information above is proper MLA purpose (use whatever style is appropriate in your field) and the annotations are in paragraph form. Period also that the entries are alphabetized by nobility first word in the bibliographic entry. If spiky are writing an annotated bibliography with many large quantity, it may be helpful to divide the cornucopia into categories. For example, if putting together archetypal extensive annotated bibliography for stem cell research, make for might be best to divide the sources hoist categories such as ethical concerns, scholarly analyses, standing political ramifications.
For more examples, a quick search be suspicious of a library or even on the Internet have to produce several examples of annotated bibliographies in your area.